Why RFOptic’s Programmable RFoF Solutions are the Perfect Replacement for Coax
September 9, 2017
RF over Fiber is gaining in popularity as a great alternative for replacing coax (copper), especially in the defense, broadcasting and telecom sectors, for various reasons:
|Coaxial cables||RFoF links|
|Signal loss||Considerable signal loss the longer the cable get||Almost no signal loss, regardless of length|
|Thickness||Bulky, fairly heavy and thick||Lightweight and flexible|
|Conductivity||Conducts electricity||Does not conduct electricity, therefore ideal for e.g., antenna applications|
|EMI||Susceptible for EMI||Glass acts as an insulator|
|Maintenance||Requires maintenance||Almost no maintenance once installed|
|Signal interception||Susceptible for signal interception||Secured against signal interception|
|Installation||Can be complicated||Straightforward, easy|
|Price point||Cost effective||Cost effective when compared to high-end, low-loss coaxial cables|
To illustrate the difference in signal loss, we see that at 20 GHz, 1000 meter of SM Fiber has 7,500 less loss than 0.15” RF cable. As shown in the graph below, the optical cable loss (single mode) is around 0.25 dB/km, while in the RF domain, the optical loss translates to ~0.5dB/km.
Since deploying fiber technology is complicated, RFOptic has developed RFoF solutions that are customizable to enable maximum flexibility for its customers. One of our customers, the US Naval Research Laboratory (NRL), tested RFOptic’s programmable RFoF and compared it with the performance of copper.
In May 2017, RFOptic celebrated its 100th deployment of its programmable RFoF solution. Following this success, successful tests were completed by the US Naval Research Laboratory (NRL), underpinning the effectiveness of RFOptic’s programmable RFoF. Let’s have a closer look at some of the test results.
The test results showed that RFOptic’s RFoF can replace coaxial cables without degradation of RF performances. The RFoF link even outperformed the copper link in one of the tests. As shown below, the Quadrature Phase-Shift Keying (QPSK) constellation test proved that the RFoF clusters were more compact than the copper clusters.
Want to know more about RFOptic superior RFoF solutions for your applications? Visit our website at http://www.rfoptic.com or contact us at email@example.com